Introduction Of India
India’s Commerce and Industry Minister, Piyush Goyal, has raised alarms over the rapid expansion of e-commerce in the country, expressing concerns about its potential impact on small retailers and the broader economy. Speaking at the launch of a report examining the effects of e-commerce on employment and consumer welfare, Goyal questioned the long-term implications of the sector’s projected dominance in India’s retail market.
Table of Contents
The E-commerce Boom: A Double-edged Sword
The minister highlighted the staggering growth of e-commerce in India, where the sector is doubling in size every four years. India’s $1.1 trillion retail market saw e-commerce sales of less than $80 billion last year, with an annual growth rate of 11% to 12%. However, Goyal warned that this growth could lead to significant social disruption, particularly for small brick-and-mortar retailers who are struggling to compete with online giants.
“Are we going to cause huge social disruption with this massive growth of e-commerce? I don’t see it as a matter of pride that half our market may become part of the e-commerce network 10 years from now; it is a matter of concern,” Goyal stated.
The minister’s concerns are not unfounded. Quick commerce startups like BlinkIt (owned by Zomato), Swiggy Instamart (backed by SoftBank), and Zepto (backed by Lightspeed) are expanding rapidly, with a collective sales projection of over $4.5 billion this year, a year-on-year growth rate exceeding 100%. These startups, which promise deliveries in 10 minutes or less, are attracting customers at an unprecedented rate, further squeezing traditional retailers.
Predatory Pricing: A Threat to Small Retailers
Goyal’s critique extended to the pricing strategies of major e-commerce firms, particularly Amazon. He questioned whether the significant losses reported by these companies were a result of predatory pricing aimed at undercutting small retailers. “How many mobile stores do you see now at the corner? How many were there 10 years ago? Where are those stores?” Goyal asked, emphasizing the existential threat e-commerce poses to traditional businesses.
He also criticized the narrative surrounding Amazon’s investment in India. While a billion-dollar investment by Amazon is often celebrated, Goyal cautioned against overlooking the underlying implications. “They made a billion dollar loss in their balance sheet that year, they had to fill in that loss… If you make Rs 6,000 crore ($715M) loss a year doesn’t it sound like predatory pricing to you?” Goyal questioned.
Legal and Regulatory Concerns
Indian law requires e-commerce companies like Amazon and Flipkart to operate as pure marketplaces, prohibiting them from owning the inventory they sell. However, Goyal suggested that the reality may be different, with these platforms potentially engaging in activities that blur the lines of legality. “They are after all an e-commerce platform, they are not allowed to do B2C, legally… However, reality is all of you buy on these platforms, how are they doing it? Should it not be a matter of concern for us?” Goyal asked.
This is not the first time Goyal has voiced concerns about e-commerce in India. In 2022, shortly after Amazon announced a $1 billion investment in its India operations, Goyal remarked that the investment was not a great favor to the country, reflecting his ongoing skepticism about the intentions of global e-commerce giants.
A Call for Cautious Progress
While Goyal acknowledged the role of e-commerce in modernizing India’s retail landscape, he urged caution in embracing this transformation. “I am not wishing away e-commerce,” Goyal said. “I don’t deny that e-commerce has a role, but we have to think very cautiously what that role is.”
As India’s e-commerce sector continues to grow, the debate over its impact on small retailers, pricing strategies, and regulatory compliance is likely to intensify. Goyal’s remarks underscore the need for a balanced approach that ensures the benefits of e-commerce do not come at the expense of traditional businesses and the livelihoods they support.
